EPA Codifies New Changes to FIFRA Minimum Risk Pesticide Requirements
Click here for a PDF of this news alert.
On December 28, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized important changes to the “minimum risk” pesticide exemption under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). See EPA, “Pesticides; Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemption,” 80 Fed. Reg. 80653 (Dec. 28, 2015). EPA’s new rule goes into effect February 26, 2016, with the exception of the deadline for compliance with new labeling requirements for minimum risk products, which is February 26, 2019.
EPA’s action follows changes proposed in December 2012 and marks the first set of revisions to EPA’s minimum risk pesticide regulations since the Agency originally promulgated them in 1996. As briefly summarized below, the changes include more detailed EPA listings of the active and inert ingredients that may be used in minimum risk pesticides. Although EPA has not added or subtracted any ingredients from its lists of eligible minimum risk product ingredients, in its survey of personal insect repellent products currently distributed as minimum risk pesticides, it found that nearly half contain ingredients not permitted by its regulations. Based on this analysis, EPA suggests that the more detailed listings included in its newly codified provisions may require manufacturers who currently distribute pesticides under the minimum risk exemption to reformulate their products to achieve compliance.
* * *
EPA first promulgated 40 CFR Section 152.25(f) in 1996, using its authority under FIFRA Section 25(b) to exempt from FIFRA’s registration requirements pesticide products that contain specific active and inert ingredients that EPA determined pose minimum risk to humans and the environment. As explained in EPA’s 2012 proposal, determining whether an ingredient on a pesticide label is the same substance referred to in EPA’s regulations has proven time-consuming and confusing over the years -- particularly given the numerous chemical, common, or Latin names that may be associated with a particular substance.
By EPA’s analysis, nearly half of the subset of 135 personal insect repellent products currently distributed as minimum risk pesticides and reviewed by the Agency contain ingredients not permitted by EPA’s regulations. According to EPA’s extrapolation, this figure underestimates the overall non-compliance rate with the ingredient criteria of the exemption. Moreover, EPA has acknowledged that products that may be exempt from Federal registration as minimum risk pesticides under FIFRA Section 25(b) still face state registration requirements in approximately 37 states and the District of Columbia. EPA has explained that the confusion surrounding which ingredients are permitted in minimum risk pesticide products has also led to inconsistent and ineffective enforcement.
EPA’s Revised Regulations
The key changes in EPA’s newly revised regulations at 40 CFR Section 152.25(f) are:
(1) Redesign of the list of eligible minimum risk active ingredients
EPA has replaced the prior list of active ingredients found at 40 CFR Section 152.25(f) with a table that shows for each permitted active ingredient:
- A specified label display name (the common chemical name that would be required to be used on labels of any products containing these ingredients);
- A specific chemical name (as determined by the Chemical Abstract Services or CAS);
- Any specifications associated with a substance (as originally included in the Agency’s 1996 regulations);
- The associated CAS Registration Number.
(2) Codification of the list of permitted inert ingredients
EPA has now codified its list of permitted inert ingredients in a separate table at 40 CFR Section 152.25(f)(2) (previously, permitted inert ingredients were found in “List 4A” and by reference to other EPA regulations). In the preamble to its final regulations, EPA acknowledges that codification of this list means that future changes must be made by notice and comment rulemaking. According to the Agency, it is examining ways to make the process of adding or removing an ingredient “as streamlined as possible,” and it anticipates developing guidance that will describe the process and types of information EPA will need to support such requests.
(3) Codification of new label requirements
EPA’s regulations now include several new labeling requirements for minimum risk products:
- Manufacturers are required to use the “label display name” of each active or inert substance as provided in the new tables, along with the percentage by weight of each active ingredient.
- Labels must provide the producer’s company name and contact information. If a company name appears on the label and that company is not the producer, the text must indicate that the product was “packed for,” “distributed by,” or “sold by” the company, to show that the company selling the product is not the producer.
Consistent with three-year relabeling cycles often used, compliance with these label changes will become mandatory on February 26, 2019 (three years from the effective date of EPA’s rule). This compliance schedule is a change from EPA’s original proposal, which had anticipated a two-year deadline.
EPA’s new regulations also provide that food and animal feed in commerce can bear pesticide residues only for those ingredients that have established tolerances or tolerance exemptions. EPA declined a request from a state agency commenter to codify more detailed requirements for minimum risk ingredients that do not have tolerance exemptions for residues that may end up in food or feed. However, as EPA explains in its regulatory preamble, the minimum risk exemption under FIFRA cannot exempt pesticides from the requirements of a tolerance or tolerance exemption under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). Under the FFDCA, any pesticide chemical residue used in or on food or feed distributed in the United States must have either an established tolerance or tolerance exemption.
As further explained by EPA, a minimum risk product label “is indicating that the product may be used in a way that may violate Federal law” if it provides for use in or on food when one or more of the product’s ingredients does not have established a tolerance or tolerance exemption. EPA considers such a label to be “false or misleading” and therefore ineligible for the minimum risk exemption as a threshold matter.
Beveridge & Diamond's reputation for excellence in pesticide law is based on forty years of working with U.S. and international clients who research, develop, obtain government approvals for, manufacture, promote, and use conventional pesticides and pesticides produced through biotechnology. We represent both large and small companies, as well as task forces of companies, with an emphasis on entities that invest in research to discover, develop, and defend new technology. We work with each client to identify its business objectives, and then to establish and implement the most effective regulatory, commercial, litigation, and legislative strategies to achieve or exceed those objectives. If you would like to discuss EPA’s new proposal or if you have any questions about the regulation of minimum risk pesticides more generally, please contact Kathy Szmuszkovicz ([email protected], (202) 789-6037) or Alan Sachs, Independent Consultant Attorney to Beveridge & Diamond, ([email protected] or (410) 230-1345) or any member of our Pesticides practice group.